A Payroll Auditing Webcast
Friday, 06 February 2009 15:07

Written By Larry Beebe

Bond Beebe, Accountants & Advisors

P: 301.272.6025 E: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

I recently participated in a webcast for the AICPA on multiemployer plans.  One of the questions submitted by a participant but left unanswered, due to time, was a multipart question on payroll auditing.  Here is how I would have answered that question:

 

  1. What have you found to be the most difficult aspect of payroll audits?

Often the most difficult decision a payroll auditor must make is deciding when to wrap up the audit.  Factors that should be considered in making this decision are:

1.       Is all testing complete?

2.       Has the scope of the audit been sufficiently expanded when errors have been discovered?

3.       Were all necessary records available for testing?

4.       Has the employer appropriately answered all of the auditor’s questions?

5.       From a cost-benefit relationship, should the audit continue?

 

I would like to know from the readers of this blog if there are other factors that should be considered in deciding whether to wrap up the audit?

 

  1. How do you effectively and efficiently audit a contractor that may employ and report to multiple plans and jurisdictions?

Ask for copies of remittance reports for the other plans.  For any employees listed on those reports, the payroll auditor can eliminate testing.  The only exception would be in those situations where two crafts are claiming the same employees.

 

  1. Do you often see special pay arrangements for union members in management positions and how do you clear those arrangements with the local union and related parties?

If you are a union member and are promoted to management, you are no longer a part of the bargaining unit, and should not be reported.

Trackback(0)
Comments (1)Add Comment
...
written by Andy Staab, February 09, 2009
Ah...when to wrap it up! That is a question that sometimes depends on the judge assigned to the case against the employer. I am assuming there's litigation. Some judges are reluctant to grant relief on delinquencies that occur after the Summons and Complaint are filed with the US District Court.
But that presumes litigation. Another thing to consider is the "look back" problem with audits that are done, i.e. wrapped up, and then something is communicated to the Fund - usually anonymously - regarding the employer's questionable payroll practices. One example is the anonymous tip that the employer is not paying fringes on all overtime hours, because the employer is re-classifying overtime as "per diem" and dodging the need to pay fringes or taxes for the hours. Should the auditor go back in after having wrapped up? The Fund's trust agreement should give the Fund's Trustees the authority to send it a payroll auditor to re-audit if there is evidence of fraud or concealment on behalf of the employer. It may not answer Mr. Beebe's question, but these situations occur on the topic of When do you Wrap it Up?

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Upcoming Events

[Full Event Listing]

Get Updates:

Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe via Email
Subscribe via FeedBurner